In people, the myth that there is always a root cause has its, well,roots in Freudian psychology and all its derivatives. The idea that people’s deviant actions can be explained by some failed sexual relationship or past traumatic experience makes us believe that if we can only figure out how we got this way, we can repair the problem, and it will never come back.
But this is like suggesting that the real reason that salespeople don’t sell is that they fear rejection or that the real reason that a brilliant product manager keeps saying foolish things that scuttle deals is that she fears success. Anthropologist Gregory Bateson called things like “fear of success” an explanatory principle. It’s a label that gives us a neat way to refer to something but that explains nothing and gives us no opportunities for effective action. Freud’s explanatory factor (the root cause) doesn’t explain anything. This approach doesn’t work.It may seem unreasonable to dismiss psychology, but sometimes that’s what you should do. Knowing more about why you are the way you are rarely leads to doing anything about it, and it doesn’t make you more inclined to go in a more productive direction. Werner Erhardt said it best, “Understanding is the booby prize.”
So while on the surface it might be tough to argue with the idea of “finding the real cause,” this approach is more suited to fixing problems such as repeated flat tires on your bicycle or quality defects in complex machinery than to figuring out why Johnnie can’t read or, in this case, why Amelia can’t sell. Root cause analysis is not that helpful when considering performance in human beings, and it is definitely not helpful for getting things done.
But root cause analysis—or any brand of excessive introspection—is an excellent way to avoid action. People tend to use the search for causes as busywork. They convince themselves that they’re actually doing something worthwhile when what they’re really doing is spinning their wheels. All this activity doesn’t move the picture forward.
But back to Amelia. I wouldn’t indulge her; I wouldn’t be politeand pretend that what she was doing was going to help. She thought I was being unreasonable (I was) because rather than hunt for causes, I asked her to cut to the chase. If she knew that speaking to groups would bring her new clients and make her (and her company) more money, I wanted to know what she could
do to get started, and when. Tangible stuff.
Once I shook her out of her lethargy, Amelia jumped in. She had lots of ideas, including ones about a new speech she could write and companies she could target as audiences for it. We used
her ideas and created a game plan; we made measures, timelines, and clear accountabilities for each aspect of the plan. We put her into our tracking system.
Now, she has a plan with specific actions that she’s committedto. She is acting on the plan and booking speaking “gigs.” Will she succeed? It’s too soon to tell, but the early indications are that she’s out there connecting with many more people than with her “word of mouth” system. She’s giving talks and getting some new business. And here’s the thing: Amelia has upped her chances for success. A lot. And that’s the best she can do. That’s all you can do.
Root cause analysis has its place, especially in large, complex organizations, engineering environments, and manufacturing situations. And if you’re an individual with a long history of
repeated mistakes, then you probably should go in for this type of psychotherapy. But if you find yourself wasting a lot of time on trying to figure things out, stop it.
You’re hurting yourself. Your mind will go around and around your subject, and it may never find the proper answer. If you aren’t producing much and you suspect that you’re in a cycle of near-endless rumination, here’s a solution for you.
Taken from : unreasonable